It seems like we have to click one invoice at a time to edit the batch imported. I would be quicker if they could simply page to the next item to add the GL details in a batch.
Sarah Dalrymple
| Company | WRS |
| Job Title / Role | Controller |
| I need it... | 1 month |
Dear Viewpoint Suggestion Box contributor;
We at Viewpoint sincerely thank you for your contribution to Suggestion Box on how we can improve Viewpoint products. While we can’t do everything at once, we rely upon your feedback to help guide the prioritization of our product improvements, and Suggestion Box is a critical tool for us to understand and prioritize our customers’ needs.
Viewpoint reviews Suggestion Box regularly for all of our products and updates statuses, adds comments, and performs various house-keeping (including deleting) as needed to ensure that Suggestion Box is maintained as a productive environment for product enhancements requests.
© 2023 Trimble Inc. All Rights Reserved. Viewpoint®, Vista™, Spectrum®, ProContractor™, Jobpac Connect™, Viewpoint Team™, Viewpoint Analytics™, Viewpoint Field View™, Viewpoint Estimating™, Viewpoint For Projects™, Viewpoint HR Management™, Viewpoint Field Management™, Viewpoint Financial Controls™, Vista Field Service™, Spectrum Service Tech™, ViewpointOne™, ProjectSight® and Trimble Construction One™ are trademarks or registered trademarks of Trimble Inc. or its affiliates in the United States and other countries. Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
More like how the AP document image of the batch automatically rolls to the next item for validation
I was meaning more of the data flow. To have each AP invoice scroll to the next vs having to go back and click and one then go back and click on one
Let me explain our rationale here.
The header information for the invoice has not been validated until you enter the various fields. In this way we make sure that this isn't a duplicate invoice and catch other errors. Rather than risk bad data, we choose this method to verify that the data was correct.
The other option would have been to no longer require the header and detail portion of the screen to be in balance. We thought long and hard on that one and decided against it for now.
So this is why it is the way it is.
Geoff